So college would not cost that much, except that the already-existing debt of college students drives them into it?
Could I, perhaps, suggest that Fell has it precisely backwards? That "college costs" is instead the monstrous football player scaring the student into running headlong into the pole of "debt"? And if I can could fix that so quickly, how come Fell's editor missed it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remember that the purpose of Editorial Explanations is to explain and to expand knowledge, rather than to engage in any partisan bickering. All cartoonists are completely correct, in their own worlds.