Chip Bok, 11/9/12:
Obama won simply because he was more heavily armed than Romney, which apparently offends the pro-NRA Bok.
Also, the gun doesn't seem to be a metaphor for a strong ground organization, or clear messaging, or appeal to particular constituencies, or any of the other real-world things that might lead one politician to beat another, which tends to eliminate any possibility of humor here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remember that the purpose of Editorial Explanations is to explain and to expand knowledge, rather than to engage in any partisan bickering. All cartoonists are completely correct, in their own worlds.