May 5, 2011

At Least He Didn't Use the Confusing "Usama" Spelling

Randall Enos, 5/3/11:
Think of this as the Rorschach test of poliical cartoons: you can read absolutely anything into it, because Enos didn't do anything but draw one name really big.

I'd love to see Enos continue in this vein -- each day, his cartoon will just be a single name, of whoever was most newsworthy the day before. Perhaps, if he's daring, he could even use different colors, once in a while, for more nuance! (Well, we mustn't go too far, though.)
Posted by Andrew Wheeler at 9:00 AM
Labels:

1 comment:

  1. BOPalex1:49 PM, May 05, 2011

    ?!?! This isn't confusing--it's infuriating! He at least should've had the honesty to draw himself at his drawing board shrugging and saying "I got nothing."

    ReplyDelete

Please remember that the purpose of Editorial Explanations is to explain and to expand knowledge, rather than to engage in any partisan bickering. All cartoonists are completely correct, in their own worlds.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)