Being Necessary to the Security of a Free State

Chuck Asay, 3/21/13:

"Arms" meaning, of course, exactly the same thing now as it did in 1791 -- the weaponry that a country uses to go to war: then, muskets, and now, advanced airplanes, tanks and nuclear submarines.

Therefore, any individual citizen that can maintain an F-16 is entitled to carry it.

Wait, are you saying Ted Cruz admits that there are military weapons that aren't covered under the Second Amendment's definition of "arms," and he's just arguing about where the line is?

Nevermind.